Interesting stuff but I definitely don't agree with the last one. There are people with natural abilities to learn faster then others. There is no dispute to this fact. This article seems to completely ignore this and seems to be saying that anyone can excel at anything given time and training. The reality is ... sure a lot of people can excel at certain things but some people excel at some things that others don't irrespective of how hard they both try.
Perfect examples of this are seen by everyone throughout their lives. One of the examples was my English exams. I always liked English but was a naturally lazy student. Some of my friends didn't like it so much but were dedicated to getting good entrance scores for university so they studied. I literally didn't. I only read the books we read in class and rarely ever handed in out of class assignments (I think I stopped completely in my final year). Yet I got better marks then many of those who worked harder and vice versa in subjects I did not like or was not profecient at.
Additionally a lot of peoples perception of someone as highly skilled in something can rely on chance. Some people get publicity, others get raw luck. For example, I only cook the simplest things for myself and rely on other family members for complex to prepare meals. I have seen how to cook them but I wouldn't be all that good at it. One day, by chance an idea shot into my head about a simple to prepare yet delicious meal. Chances are its been done before but it was above and beyond most things my family prepare in my own eyes.
A better example in the cooking field is a couple of Radio presenters in Australia. They interviewed Jamie Oliver (the famous British chef) and showed him, on air, a new technique for making toasted cheese sandwiches. They're not professional cooks but Oliver has since used this idea because of how novel and good it is.
Sorry for the rant ... some very interesting links there.
I was actually focusing more on the slashdot reader comments more than the article itself (which i didnt really read through). The arguments by readers were primarily made against the theory that genious is hard work rather than innate
Yeah, I agree with a lot of what you said. I, for one, am a pretty lazy student yet I'm the smartest in my class. Many students that aren't as smart as me get better grades. Yet there's no way that one of those students can ever be better at math than me, because there's a difference between instantly understanding it and working hard ot figure it out.
True that ... I didn't do Maths in year 12 because in Year 11 I was working all the algebra and complex calculations out in my head ... as I knew I'd need to do that in the future. Because I didn't show working out I was told that I failed even though I would repeatedly get the answers right. I was never instructed to do the working out. I think there was an assumption I cheated because perhaps the teacher couldn't do it herself. The crazy part is that I wasn't even interested in a good mark ... I just wanted to learn and they tried to stop me ... at a private school.
lol, some people are just good learners. I actually just started 8th grade (one of the younger dA members), and so far (i.e. 4 days) we haven't really learned anything in math. Just out of curiosity, I flipped to the back of the math book (we're actually doing like 10th grade math) to see if I could do most of the problems, and yes, I can. So, at 13 years old, I can do 9th or 10th grade math without ever being taught it. Yet my grades last year sucked, because I was bored as hell in most of my classes.
Perfect examples of this are seen by everyone throughout their lives. One of the examples was my English exams. I always liked English but was a naturally lazy student. Some of my friends didn't like it so much but were dedicated to getting good entrance scores for university so they studied. I literally didn't. I only read the books we read in class and rarely ever handed in out of class assignments (I think I stopped completely in my final year). Yet I got better marks then many of those who worked harder and vice versa in subjects I did not like or was not profecient at.
Additionally a lot of peoples perception of someone as highly skilled in something can rely on chance. Some people get publicity, others get raw luck. For example, I only cook the simplest things for myself and rely on other family members for complex to prepare meals. I have seen how to cook them but I wouldn't be all that good at it. One day, by chance an idea shot into my head about a simple to prepare yet delicious meal. Chances are its been done before but it was above and beyond most things my family prepare in my own eyes.
A better example in the cooking field is a couple of Radio presenters in Australia. They interviewed Jamie Oliver (the famous British chef) and showed him, on air, a new technique for making toasted cheese sandwiches. They're not professional cooks but Oliver has since used this idea because of how novel and good it is.
Sorry for the rant ... some very interesting links there.
-_- Get to work!! XD.